第17分野 職場の対立・コンフリクト・交渉・関係修復
修復・公正研究
謝罪、信頼、赦し、応報・修復、公正をたどります。
文献最終確認日 分野完成版 v0.1
謝罪と信頼違反、関係修復、原因帰属、赦し、和解ニーズ、応報・修復的正義、組織的公正を収録しました。
このページの主な出典
- Kim, P. H. et al. (2004). Removing the Shadow of Suspicion: The Effects of Apology versus Denial for Repairing Competence- versus Integrity-Based Trust Violationslaboratory experiments
- Dirks, K. T., Lewicki, R. J., & Zaheer, A. (2009). Repairing Relationships within and between Organizationsintegrative framework
- Tomlinson, E. C., & Mayer, R. C. (2009). The Role of Causal Attribution Dimensions in Trust Repairconceptual model
- Lewicki, R. J., & Brinsfield, C. (2017). Trust Repairannual review
- Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The Road to Forgiveness: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis of Its Situational and Dispositional Correlatesmeta-analysis
- Wenzel, M. et al. (2008). Retributive and Restorative Justicetheoretical and experimental review
- Okimoto, T. G., & Wenzel, M. (2009). Punishment as Restoration of Group and Offender Values Following a Transgression: Value Consensus through Symbolic Labelling and Offender Reformexperimental studies
- Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A Needs-Based Model of Reconciliationexperimental studies
- Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justicemeasure validation
- Colquitt, J. A. et al. (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Researchmeta-analysis
- Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the Name of Justicefield quasi-experiment
- Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The Group Engagement Modelintegrative theory
- Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Jones, K. S., & Liao, H. (2014). The Utility of a Multifoci Approach to the Study of Organizational Justicemeta-analysis