{ "name": "ワーク・エンゲージメント 研究メタデータ", "version": "0.1", "notice": "論文本文・尺度項目は含みません。各権利者の条件に従ってください。", "studies": [ { "id": "kahn-1990", "authors": "Kahn, W. A.", "year": 1990, "title": "Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work", "journal": "Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724", "doi": "10.2307/256287", "type": "qualitative theory-building", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "サマーキャンプ職員と建築事務所員", "sample": "2つの職場事例、インタビュー中心", "method": "役割への自己投入・引き離しを質的に分析", "finding": "有意味感、安全性、利用可能性を個人的エンゲージメントの条件として提示", "limitations": [ "現代のUWES型ワーク・エンゲージメントとは概念系譜が異なる", "小規模・探索的" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.2307/256287", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "schaufeli-2002", "authors": "Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B.", "year": 2002, "title": "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach", "journal": "Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92", "doi": "10.1023/A:1015630930326", "type": "measure development and validation", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "大学生と労働者", "sample": "2標本。詳細は原文参照", "method": "活力・熱意・没頭とバーンアウトの因子構造を検討", "finding": "UWESの三次元モデルとバーンアウトとの弁別を提示", "limitations": [ "初期尺度開発", "学生標本を含む", "文化間不変性は別途検証" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "harter-2002", "authors": "Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L.", "year": 2002, "title": "Business-Unit-Level Relationship Between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis", "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279", "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268", "type": "business-unit meta-analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "複数企業の事業単位", "sample": "7,939事業単位、36社", "method": "独自の満足・エンゲージメント指標と顧客、利益、生産性、離職、安全の関係を統合", "finding": "事業単位レベルで望ましい成果との関連を報告", "limitations": [ "UWESとは異なる独自指標", "企業提供データ", "因果を確定しない" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "schaufeli-bakker-2004", "authors": "Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B.", "year": 2004, "title": "Job Demands, Job Resources, and Their Relationship with Burnout and Engagement", "journal": "Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315", "doi": "10.1002/job.248", "type": "multisample field study", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "4つの労働者標本", "sample": "合計1,698人", "method": "JD-R、バーンアウト、エンゲージメント、健康、離職意図の構造モデル", "finding": "仕事資源は主にエンゲージメント、仕事要求は主に消耗と関連", "limitations": [ "横断データ中心", "自己報告", "因果方向は確定しない" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "saks-2006", "authors": "Saks, A. M.", "year": 2006, "title": "Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement", "journal": "Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619", "doi": "10.1108/02683940610690169", "type": "cross-sectional field study", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "カナダの多様な職種の従業員", "sample": "102人", "method": "職務・組織エンゲージメントを社会的交換理論から分析", "finding": "支援、公正、仕事特性等との関連を報告", "limitations": [ "小規模横断研究", "独自尺度", "自己報告" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "macey-schneider-2008", "authors": "Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B.", "year": 2008, "title": "The Meaning of Employee Engagement", "journal": "Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3–30", "doi": "10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x", "type": "conceptual review", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "従業員エンゲージメント研究", "sample": "概念文献の統合", "method": "特性・状態・行動エンゲージメントを区別", "finding": "employee engagementという語の多義性を整理", "limitations": [ "実証メタ分析ではない", "UWES型概念と商業指標を含む広い整理" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "shimazu-2008", "authors": "Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kosugi, S., et al.", "year": 2008, "title": "Work Engagement in Japan: Validation of the Japanese Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale", "journal": "Applied Psychology, 57(3), 510–523", "doi": "10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00333.x", "type": "Japanese scale validation", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "日本の労働者", "sample": "3つの独立標本、合計2,334人", "method": "UWES日本語版の因子構造・信頼性・妥当性を検証", "finding": "日本語版UWESの測定根拠を提示", "limitations": [ "自己報告", "全国診断基準ではない", "項目利用条件を確認" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00333.x", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "shimazu-2009", "authors": "Shimazu, A., & Schaufeli, W. B.", "year": 2009, "title": "Is Workaholism Good or Bad for Employee Well-being? The Distinctiveness of Workaholism and Work Engagement among Japanese Employees", "journal": "Industrial Health, 47(5), 495–502", "doi": "10.2486/indhealth.47.495", "type": "Japanese cross-sectional field study", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "日本の労働者", "sample": "776人", "method": "ワーカホリズム、エンゲージメント、ウェルビーイングを比較", "finding": "長時間・高投資でも強迫性を伴うワーカホリズムと肯定的状態を区別", "limitations": [ "横断研究", "自己報告", "因果は不明" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.47.495", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "crawford-2010", "authors": "Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L.", "year": 2010, "title": "Linking Job Demands and Resources to Employee Engagement and Burnout: A Theoretical Extension and Meta-Analytic Test", "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834–848", "doi": "10.1037/a0019364", "type": "meta-analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "職場研究", "sample": "64独立標本", "method": "挑戦的要求・阻害的要求・資源とエンゲージメントを統合", "finding": "挑戦的要求は正、阻害的要求は負、資源は正の関連を示す傾向", "limitations": [ "要求分類の文脈依存", "観察研究中心", "過重負荷を正当化できない" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019364", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "shimazu-2010", "authors": "Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Miyanaka, D., & Iwata, N.", "year": 2010, "title": "Why Japanese Workers Show Low Work Engagement: An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale", "journal": "BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 4, 17", "doi": "10.1186/1751-0759-4-17", "type": "cross-cultural measurement analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "日本とオランダの労働者", "sample": "日本2,339人、オランダ13,406人", "method": "項目反応理論で国間得点差を分析", "finding": "回答傾向・項目機能が平均差へ影響する可能性を提示", "limitations": [ "国は文化の代理にすぎない", "平均差を国民性へ還元できない", "横断データ" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0759-4-17", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "rich-2010", "authors": "Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R.", "year": 2010, "title": "Job Engagement: Antecedents and Effects on Job Performance", "journal": "Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635", "doi": "10.5465/amj.2010.51468988", "type": "field study", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "米国の消防士", "sample": "245人と上司", "method": "身体・認知・情緒的な職務エンゲージメントと業績を分析", "finding": "価値適合、心理的安全性、利用可能性と業績の関係を検討", "limitations": [ "単一職種", "独自尺度", "観察研究" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "christian-2011", "authors": "Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E.", "year": 2011, "title": "Work Engagement: A Quantitative Review and Test of Its Relations with Task and Contextual Performance", "journal": "Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136", "doi": "10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x", "type": "meta-analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "複数職種の労働者", "sample": "91研究", "method": "概念・先行要因・タスク/文脈的業績との関連を統合", "finding": "仕事特性・リーダーシップ等と関連し、業績へ独自の関連を示す", "limitations": [ "横断研究を多く含む", "共通方法バイアス", "因果確定ではない" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "bakker-2011", "authors": "Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P.", "year": 2011, "title": "Key Questions Regarding Work Engagement", "journal": "European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 4–28", "doi": "10.1080/1359432X.2010.485352", "type": "conceptual review", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "ワーク・エンゲージメント研究", "sample": "主要研究のテーマ別統合", "method": "定義、測定、先行要因、成果、介入課題を整理", "finding": "状態性、日内変動、チーム、介入などの研究課題を提示", "limitations": [ "系統的レビューではない", "当時の研究に限定" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.485352", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "bailey-2017", "authors": "Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L.", "year": 2017, "title": "The Meaning, Antecedents and Outcomes of Employee Engagement: A Narrative Synthesis", "journal": "International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 31–53", "doi": "10.1111/ijmr.12077", "type": "systematic narrative synthesis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "employee engagement研究", "sample": "214研究", "method": "概念、測定、先行要因、成果を体系的に統合", "finding": "定義と尺度の断片化、因果研究不足を指摘", "limitations": [ "異質性のため効果量統合なし", "employee engagementの広い概念を含む" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12077", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "knight-2017", "authors": "Knight, C., Patterson, M., & Dawson, J.", "year": 2017, "title": "Building Work Engagement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Investigating the Effectiveness of Work Engagement Interventions", "journal": "Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 792–812", "doi": "10.1002/job.2167", "type": "systematic review and meta-analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "職場介入参加者", "sample": "適格20研究、効果量統合14研究", "method": "個人資源、仕事資源、リーダー研修、健康促進介入を統合", "finding": "全体として小さい肯定的効果（Hedges g=0.29）を報告", "limitations": [ "研究数が少ない", "自己報告中心", "介入・追跡の異質性と高い異質性" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2167", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "inamizu-2018", "authors": "Inamizu, N., & Makishima, M.", "year": 2018, "title": "Job Performance Explains Work Engagement", "journal": "Annals of Business Administrative Science, 17, 163–169", "doi": "10.7880/abas.0180712a", "type": "Japanese longitudinal analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "日本企業の従業員", "sample": "2時点職域データ。詳細は原文参照", "method": "交差遅延的にエンゲージメントと業績認識の方向を検討", "finding": "成果が後のエンゲージメントを説明する逆方向の可能性を提示", "limitations": [ "自己報告業績", "単一組織文脈", "短期縦断" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.7880/abas.0180712a", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "lesener-2019", "authors": "Lesener, T., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C.", "year": 2019, "title": "The Job Demands–Resources Model: A Meta-Analytic Review of Longitudinal Studies", "journal": "Work & Stress, 33(1), 76–103", "doi": "10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065", "type": "longitudinal meta-analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "複数職種の縦断研究", "sample": "74研究", "method": "JD-Rの時間的関係をメタ分析", "finding": "要求・資源とバーンアウト・エンゲージメントの時間的関連を支持", "limitations": [ "効果は小さい", "測定間隔と尺度が異質", "双方向性" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "virga-2019", "authors": "Vîrgă, D., Maricuțoiu, L. P., & Iancu, A.", "year": 2019, "title": "The Efficacy of Work Engagement Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials", "journal": "Current Psychology, 40, 5863–5880", "doi": "10.1007/s12144-019-00438-z", "type": "meta-analysis of controlled trials", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "職場介入研究", "sample": "14比較研究", "method": "対照群のある介入に限定して統合", "finding": "小さい効果を報告するが研究品質で変動", "limitations": [ "研究数が少ない", "追跡期間が短い", "介入の異質性" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00438-z", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "schaufeli-2019", "authors": "Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M., & De Witte, H.", "year": 2019, "title": "An Ultra-Short Measure for Work Engagement: The UWES-3 Validation Across Five Countries", "journal": "European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 577–591", "doi": "10.1027/1015-5759/a000430", "type": "cross-national scale validation", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "5か国の労働者", "sample": "複数の大規模職域標本", "method": "3項目版の構造・信頼性・妥当性・不変性を検討", "finding": "短い測定の実用性を提示", "limitations": [ "3次元を各1項目で測る", "個人の高重要度判断には不向き", "国別代表性に差" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000430", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "eguchi-2020", "authors": "Eguchi, H., Inoue, A., Kachi, Y., Miyaki, K., & Tsutsumi, A.", "year": 2020, "title": "Work Engagement and Work Performance Among Japanese Workers", "journal": "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62(12), 993–997", "doi": "10.1097/JOM.0000000000001977", "type": "Japanese prospective cohort", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "日本の労働者", "sample": "職域コホート。詳細は原文参照", "method": "エンゲージメントと後続の職務遂行を縦断分析", "finding": "日本の職場でも時間を隔てた業績との関連を検討", "limitations": [ "自己報告指標を含む", "特定職域", "効果の一般化に注意" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001977", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "frederick-2020", "authors": "Frederick, D. E., & VanderWeele, T. J.", "year": 2020, "title": "Longitudinal Meta-Analysis of Job Crafting Shows Positive Association with Work Engagement", "journal": "Cogent Psychology, 7(1), 1746733", "doi": "10.1080/23311908.2020.1746733", "type": "longitudinal meta-analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "職場のジョブ・クラフティング研究", "sample": "縦断研究群", "method": "ジョブ・クラフティングと後続エンゲージメントを統合", "finding": "小さい正の縦断関連を報告", "limitations": [ "介入効果とは限らない", "自己報告", "研究数の制約" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1746733", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "toth-kiraly-2020", "authors": "Tóth-Király, I., Morin, A. J. S., & Salmela-Aro, K.", "year": 2021, "title": "A Longitudinal Perspective on the Associations Between Work Engagement and Workaholism", "journal": "Work & Stress, 35(1), 27–56", "doi": "10.1080/02678373.2020.1801888", "type": "longitudinal person-centered study", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "労働者", "sample": "3時点縦断標本", "method": "エンゲージメントとワーカホリズムのプロファイル・変化を分析", "finding": "両者が併存し得るが同一でないことを示す", "limitations": [ "特定国標本", "自己報告", "プロファイル解釈に注意" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2020.1801888", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "neuber-2021", "authors": "Neuber, L., Englitz, C., Schulte, N., Forthmann, B., & Holling, H.", "year": 2022, "title": "How Work Engagement Relates to Performance and Absenteeism: A Meta-Analysis", "journal": "European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(2), 292–315", "doi": "10.1080/1359432X.2021.1953989", "type": "meta-analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "複数職種の労働者", "sample": "複数の独立標本。詳細は原文参照", "method": "タスク・文脈的・適応的業績と欠勤の関連を統合", "finding": "業績と正、欠勤と弱い負の関連を報告", "limitations": [ "主観業績で関連が強い可能性", "因果確定ではない", "出版バイアスの検討に限界" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1953989", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "lee-2021", "authors": "Lee, Y., Lee, J. Y., & Lee, J.", "year": 2022, "title": "The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Workaholism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis", "journal": "European Journal of Training and Development, 46(9), 996–1020", "doi": "10.1108/EJTD-03-2021-0036", "type": "systematic review and meta-analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "労働者", "sample": "研究群。件数は原文参照", "method": "エンゲージメントとワーカホリズムの関連・境界を統合", "finding": "正の関連があり得るが、動機・健康結果の違いから区別が必要", "limitations": [ "横断研究が多い", "尺度の異質性", "長時間労働の扱いが不均一" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-03-2021-0036", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "bjork-2021", "authors": "Björk, J. M., Bolander, P., & Forsman, A. K.", "year": 2021, "title": "Bottom-Up Interventions Effective in Promoting Work Engagement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis", "journal": "Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 730421", "doi": "10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730421", "type": "systematic review and meta-analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "職場のボトムアップ介入", "sample": "系統的レビュー31研究、メタ分析24研究", "method": "ジョブ・クラフティング、強み、資源構築等を統合", "finding": "小さい改善（SMD=0.22相当）の可能性を報告", "limitations": [ "自己選択・自己報告", "組織条件を直接変えない介入が多い", "長期追跡不足" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730421", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "mazzetti-2021", "authors": "Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B.", "year": 2023, "title": "Work Engagement: A Meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands–Resources Model", "journal": "Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1069–1107", "doi": "10.1177/00332941211051988", "type": "meta-analysis", "status": "peer-reviewed", "population": "複数職種・国", "sample": "533相関、113独立標本（メタ分析 k=94、n=119,420）", "method": "JD-Rに基づく先行要因・成果・ウェルビーイング相関を統合", "finding": "仕事・個人資源と正、成果と正、要求の種類で関係が異なる", "limitations": [ "横断研究が多い", "異質性が高い", "因果を直接確定しない" ], "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211051988", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" }, { "id": "who-2022", "authors": "World Health Organization", "year": 2022, "title": "WHO Guidelines on Mental Health at Work", "journal": "World Health Organization, ISBN 9789240053052", "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052", "type": "official evidence-based guideline", "status": "official guideline", "population": "働く人と職場", "sample": "組織介入、管理職・労働者研修、個人介入、復職等のエビデンス", "method": "ガイドライン開発手続に基づく推奨", "finding": "職場のメンタルヘルス促進・予防・就労参加のため組織介入等を推奨", "limitations": [ "ワーク・エンゲージメント専用ガイドラインではない", "各国制度への適用が必要" ], "source_url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052", "last_human_verified": "2026-07-11" } ] }