{
  "name": "仕事の設計・裁量・役割 研究メタデータ",
  "version": "0.1",
  "notice": "論文本文・尺度項目は含みません。各権利者の条件に従ってください。",
  "studies": [
    {
      "id": "rizzo-1970",
      "authors": "Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I.",
      "year": 1970,
      "title": "Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations",
      "journal": "Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150–163",
      "doi": "10.2307/2391486",
      "type": "construct development and field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "複雑組織の従業員",
      "sample": "複数組織標本",
      "method": "役割葛藤・曖昧性の概念と尺度を開発",
      "finding": "役割の不一致と不明確さを区別して測定",
      "limitations": [
        "古典的尺度研究",
        "尺度項目は再配布しない",
        "現在の多様な働き方への適合を確認"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.2307/2391486",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "hackman-oldham-1976",
      "authors": "Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R.",
      "year": 1976,
      "title": "Motivation Through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory",
      "journal": "Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279",
      "doi": "10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7",
      "type": "theory test and field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "複数職務の従業員",
      "sample": "職務・従業員標本",
      "method": "技能多様性、タスク完結性、重要性、自律性、フィードバックと心理状態・結果を検討",
      "finding": "仕事特性モデルの主要関係を検証",
      "limitations": [
        "自己報告・相関を含む",
        "個人差・文脈差",
        "五特性だけで仕事全体を表さない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "karasek-1979",
      "authors": "Karasek, R. A.",
      "year": 1979,
      "title": "Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign",
      "journal": "Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308",
      "doi": "10.2307/2392498",
      "type": "theory and observational study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "働く人",
      "sample": "米国・スウェーデンの調査データ",
      "method": "心理的要求度と意思決定自由度、精神的負担の関係を分析",
      "finding": "高要求・低裁量の組合せに注目するモデルを提示",
      "limitations": [
        "観察研究",
        "交互作用の再現性は後続研究で限定",
        "職務・国差"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "jackson-schuler-1985",
      "authors": "Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S.",
      "year": 1985,
      "title": "A Meta-Analysis and Conceptual Critique of Research on Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict in Work Settings",
      "journal": "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(1), 16–78",
      "doi": "10.1016/0749-5978(85)90020-2",
      "type": "meta-analysis and conceptual critique",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "職場の役割ストレス研究",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "役割曖昧性・葛藤の先行要因と結果を統合",
      "finding": "役割ストレスと態度・行動・個人特性等の関係を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "古典的統合",
        "研究間異質性",
        "因果方向"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90020-2",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "fried-ferris-1987",
      "authors": "Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R.",
      "year": 1987,
      "title": "The Validity of the Job Characteristics Model: A Review and Meta-Analysis",
      "journal": "Personnel Psychology, 40(2), 287–322",
      "doi": "10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00605.x",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "仕事特性モデル研究",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "仕事特性、心理状態、結果、成長欲求等を統合",
      "finding": "モデルの一部を支持しつつ媒介・調整の限界を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "研究時代・測定の制約",
        "全ての理論経路が同程度に支持されたわけでない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00605.x",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "tubre-collins-2000",
      "authors": "Tubre, T. C., & Collins, J. M.",
      "year": 2000,
      "title": "Jackson and Schuler (1985) Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Job Performance",
      "journal": "Journal of Management, 26(1), 155–169",
      "doi": "10.1177/014920630002600104",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "従業員",
      "sample": "役割ストレスと業績研究群",
      "method": "役割曖昧性・葛藤と業績の関係を更新統合",
      "finding": "両者と業績の負の関係を報告",
      "limitations": [
        "関連であり因果確定ではない",
        "仕事・尺度の異質性"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600104",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "demerouti-2001",
      "authors": "Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B.",
      "year": 2001,
      "title": "The Job Demands–Resources Model of Burnout",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499",
      "type": "multisample field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "複数職種の従業員",
      "sample": "3職業標本",
      "method": "仕事要求度と資源が消耗・離脱へ至る経路を検討",
      "finding": "要求度と資源の異なる過程を示すJD-Rモデルを提示",
      "limitations": [
        "観察研究",
        "要求・資源を無制限に拡張しない",
        "職種差"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "wrzesniewski-dutton-2001",
      "authors": "Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E.",
      "year": 2001,
      "title": "Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work",
      "journal": "Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201",
      "doi": "10.5465/amr.2001.4378011",
      "type": "conceptual theory",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "従業員の仕事変更",
      "sample": "理論・事例",
      "method": "課題・関係・認知の境界を変えるジョブ・クラフティングを理論化",
      "finding": "従業員を仕事設計の能動的主体として位置づける",
      "limitations": [
        "概念論文",
        "介入効果の証明ではない",
        "組織の設計責任を代替しない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378011",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "gagne-deci-2005",
      "authors": "Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L.",
      "year": 2005,
      "title": "Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation",
      "journal": "Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362",
      "doi": "10.1002/job.322",
      "type": "integrative theory review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "職場の動機づけ",
      "sample": "理論・実証文献",
      "method": "自律的・統制的動機づけと基本的心理欲求を職場へ統合",
      "finding": "自律性支援と内在化の条件を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "概念・統合論文",
        "自律性を放任と同一視しない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "morgeson-humphrey-2006",
      "authors": "Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E.",
      "year": 2006,
      "title": "The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and Validating a Comprehensive Measure for Assessing Job Design and the Nature of Work",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321",
      "type": "measurement and field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "多様な職務",
      "sample": "複数標本",
      "method": "動機づけ・知識・社会・文脈特性を測るWDQを開発・検証",
      "finding": "仕事設計を多次元で評価する枠組みを提示",
      "limitations": [
        "自己報告を含む",
        "尺度項目・採点権利を確認",
        "診断だけで改善を保証しない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "humphrey-2007",
      "authors": "Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P.",
      "year": 2007,
      "title": "Integrating Motivational, Social, and Contextual Work Design Features: A Meta-Analytic Summary and Theoretical Extension of the Work Design Literature",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "仕事設計研究",
      "sample": "259研究、219,625人",
      "method": "動機づけ・社会・文脈特性と態度・行動結果を統合",
      "finding": "仕事設計の複数次元が態度・行動・役割認知等と関連",
      "limitations": [
        "相関研究を多く含む",
        "平均関連を個別職務へ直結しない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "bakker-demerouti-2007",
      "authors": "Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E.",
      "year": 2007,
      "title": "The Job Demands–Resources Model: State of the Art",
      "journal": "Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328",
      "doi": "10.1108/02683940710733115",
      "type": "integrative review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "職場の要求度・資源",
      "sample": "理論・実証文献",
      "method": "消耗過程と動機づけ過程、相互作用を整理",
      "finding": "職種固有の要求度・資源を柔軟に扱うJD-Rを整理",
      "limitations": [
        "モデルの広さが反証可能性を弱め得る",
        "因果・測定を個別確認"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "gajendran-harrison-2007",
      "authors": "Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A.",
      "year": 2007,
      "title": "The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown About Telecommuting: Meta-Analysis of Psychological Mediators and Individual Consequences",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "テレワーカー",
      "sample": "46研究、12,883人",
      "method": "自律性、仕事家庭葛藤、関係、満足、業績等を統合",
      "finding": "総じて小さな有益関連を報告し、強度等の条件差を検討",
      "limitations": [
        "パンデミック前の任意テレワーク中心",
        "職種・頻度・選択可能性の差"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "grant-2007",
      "authors": "Grant, A. M.",
      "year": 2007,
      "title": "Relational Job Design and the Motivation to Make a Prosocial Difference",
      "journal": "Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417",
      "doi": "10.5465/amr.2007.24351328",
      "type": "conceptual theory",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "他者へ影響する仕事",
      "sample": "理論・先行研究",
      "method": "仕事の受益者との接触・影響と向社会的動機を理論化",
      "finding": "仕事の社会的・関係的設計を拡張",
      "limitations": [
        "概念論文",
        "感情労働・境界・負担も確認"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351328",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "grant-2008",
      "authors": "Grant, A. M.",
      "year": 2008,
      "title": "The Significance of Task Significance: Job Performance Effects, Relational Mechanisms, and Boundary Conditions",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108–124",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108",
      "type": "field experiments",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "サービス・募金等の従業員",
      "sample": "複数フィールド研究",
      "method": "仕事の受益者との接触・重要性介入と業績を検討",
      "finding": "タスク重要性が関係的機序を通じ業績へ影響し得ることを示唆",
      "limitations": [
        "特定職務・介入",
        "意味づけの強制や感情負担に注意"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "sonnentag-fritz-2007",
      "authors": "Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C.",
      "year": 2007,
      "title": "The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Measure for Assessing Recuperation and Unwinding from Work",
      "journal": "Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204–221",
      "doi": "10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204",
      "type": "measurement and field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "働く人",
      "sample": "複数標本",
      "method": "心理的切離し、リラックス、熟達、コントロールの回復経験尺度を開発・検証",
      "finding": "非勤務時間の回復経験を多次元で測る枠組みを提示",
      "limitations": [
        "自己報告",
        "回復を過重要求の代替にしない",
        "尺度利用条件を確認"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "tims-bakker-2010",
      "authors": "Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B.",
      "year": 2010,
      "title": "Job Crafting: Towards a New Model of Individual Job Redesign",
      "journal": "South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2)",
      "doi": "10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841",
      "type": "conceptual theory",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "従業員の能動的仕事変更",
      "sample": "理論・先行研究",
      "method": "JD-Rに基づく資源増加・要求調整としてジョブ・クラフティングを整理",
      "finding": "個人による仕事要求度・資源の変更モデルを提示",
      "limitations": [
        "概念論文",
        "組織的再設計の代替ではない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "joyce-2010",
      "authors": "Joyce, K., Pabayo, R., Critchley, J. A., & Bambra, C.",
      "year": 2010,
      "title": "Flexible Working Conditions and Their Effects on Employee Health and Wellbeing",
      "journal": "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2",
      "doi": "10.1002/14651858.CD008009.pub2",
      "type": "systematic review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "柔軟な働き方の介入対象者",
      "sample": "統制研究群",
      "method": "従業員の裁量を高める柔軟勤務等と健康・ウェルビーイングを統合",
      "finding": "従業員の選択・裁量を伴う一部介入に肯定的知見を報告",
      "limitations": [
        "研究数・質の制約",
        "柔軟性の種類が異質",
        "使用者都合の柔軟化と区別"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008009.pub2",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "eatough-2012",
      "authors": "Eatough, E. M., Way, J. D., & Chang, C.-H.",
      "year": 2012,
      "title": "Understanding the Link Between Psychosocial Work Stressors and Work-Related Musculoskeletal Complaints",
      "journal": "Applied Ergonomics, 43(3), 554–563",
      "doi": "10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.009",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "働く人の心理社会的ストレッサーと筋骨格系訴え",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "仕事ストレッサーと筋骨格系訴えの関係を統合",
      "finding": "心理社会的仕事要因と筋骨格系訴えの関連を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "自己報告・観察研究を含む",
        "身体的曝露・個人差と併せて評価",
        "因果方向"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.009",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "kelly-2014",
      "authors": "Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., Oakes, J. M., Fan, W., Okechukwu, C., Davis, K. D., Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., King, R. B., Hanson, G. C., Mierzwa, F., & Casper, L. M.",
      "year": 2014,
      "title": "Changing Work and Work-Family Conflict: Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network",
      "journal": "American Sociological Review, 79(3), 485–516",
      "doi": "10.1177/0003122414531435",
      "type": "group-randomized workplace intervention",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "IT部門の従業員",
      "sample": "組織単位介入標本",
      "method": "勤務時間・場所の裁量と管理職支援を変える仕事再設計を評価",
      "finding": "仕事家庭葛藤等の改善を報告",
      "limitations": [
        "特定企業・職種",
        "複合介入で成分効果を分離困難"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414531435",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "kubicek-2015",
      "authors": "Kubicek, B., Paškvan, M., & Korunka, C.",
      "year": 2015,
      "title": "Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Job Demands Arising from Accelerated Change: The Intensification of Job Demands Scale (IDS)",
      "journal": "European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 898–913",
      "doi": "10.1080/1359432X.2014.979160",
      "type": "measurement and field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "働く人",
      "sample": "複数職業標本",
      "method": "仕事量・計画・学習・意思決定等の強化を測定",
      "finding": "加速する変化に伴う複数の仕事強化次元を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "自己報告",
        "因果確定ではない",
        "尺度利用条件を確認"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.979160",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "bowling-2015",
      "authors": "Bowling, N. A., Alarcon, G. M., Bragg, C. B., & Hartman, M. J.",
      "year": 2015,
      "title": "A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Potential Correlates and Consequences of Workload",
      "journal": "Work & Stress, 29(2), 95–113",
      "doi": "10.1080/02678373.2015.1033037",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "働く人の仕事量研究",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "仕事量の先行要因と態度・健康・行動結果を統合",
      "finding": "仕事量と複数の負担・態度結果の関連を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "主観的仕事量を多く含む",
        "仕事量の定義・測定が異質",
        "因果方向"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1033037",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "moen-2016",
      "authors": "Moen, P., Kelly, E. L., Fan, W., Lee, S.-R., Almeida, D., Kossek, E. E., & Buxton, O. M.",
      "year": 2016,
      "title": "Does a Flexibility/Support Organizational Initiative Improve High-Tech Employees’ Well-Being? Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network",
      "journal": "American Sociological Review, 81(1), 134–164",
      "doi": "10.1177/0003122415622391",
      "type": "group-randomized workplace intervention",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "高技術企業の従業員",
      "sample": "組織単位介入標本",
      "method": "勤務裁量と管理職支援の複合介入を評価",
      "finding": "ウェルビーイング等の一部改善を報告",
      "limitations": [
        "特定企業・職種",
        "複合介入",
        "実装条件"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415622391",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "vandenbroeck-2016",
      "authors": "Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, C. C.",
      "year": 2016,
      "title": "A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work",
      "journal": "Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229",
      "doi": "10.1177/0149206316632058",
      "type": "meta-analytic review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "職場の自律性・有能感・関係性欲求",
      "sample": "99研究、119標本",
      "method": "欲求充足・阻害と先行要因・結果を統合",
      "finding": "基本的心理欲求とウェルビーイング・動機・態度等の関連を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "自己報告・横断研究を含む",
        "裁量制度と自律性欲求充足を区別"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "kecklund-axelsson-2016",
      "authors": "Kecklund, G., & Axelsson, J.",
      "year": 2016,
      "title": "Health Consequences of Shift Work and Insufficient Sleep",
      "journal": "BMJ, 355, i5210",
      "doi": "10.1136/bmj.i5210",
      "type": "clinical and occupational review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "交代・夜間勤務者",
      "sample": "疫学・実験研究",
      "method": "交代勤務、概日リズム、睡眠不足と健康影響を統合",
      "finding": "夜間・交代勤務と睡眠不足に伴う複数の健康リスクを整理",
      "limitations": [
        "勤務表・個人差の異質性",
        "個人診断ではない",
        "職種別設計が必要"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5210",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "parker-2017",
      "authors": "Parker, S. K., Morgeson, F. P., & Johns, G.",
      "year": 2017,
      "title": "One Hundred Years of Work Design Research: Looking Back and Looking Forward",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 403–420",
      "doi": "10.1037/apl0000106",
      "type": "centennial review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "仕事設計研究",
      "sample": "100年の理論・実証文献",
      "method": "歴史、理論、介入、将来課題を統合",
      "finding": "個人・組織・社会・技術を含む仕事設計研究の拡張を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "ナラティブレビュー",
        "介入効果の再計算ではない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000106",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "bakker-demerouti-2017",
      "authors": "Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E.",
      "year": 2017,
      "title": "Job Demands–Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward",
      "journal": "Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285",
      "doi": "10.1037/ocp0000056",
      "type": "integrative review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "職場の要求度・資源研究",
      "sample": "JD-R研究群",
      "method": "理論の発展、個人・組織結果、ジョブ・クラフティング等を整理",
      "finding": "要求度と資源の動的過程・個人差・介入課題を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "広い枠組み",
        "全変数を事後的に分類しない",
        "因果を個別確認"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "rudolph-2017",
      "authors": "Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H.",
      "year": 2017,
      "title": "Job Crafting: A Meta-Analysis of Relationships with Individual Differences, Job Characteristics, and Work Outcomes",
      "journal": "Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112–138",
      "doi": "10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "働く人のジョブ・クラフティング",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "個人差、仕事特性、エンゲージメント、業績等との関連を統合",
      "finding": "促進的クラフティングと複数結果の関連を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "相関研究中心",
        "逆因果・共通方法",
        "個人努力で組織問題を解決しない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "bruning-campion-2018",
      "authors": "Bruning, P. F., & Campion, M. A.",
      "year": 2018,
      "title": "A Role–Resource Approach–Avoidance Model of Job Crafting: A Multimethod Integration and Extension of Job Crafting Theory",
      "journal": "Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 499–522",
      "doi": "10.5465/amj.2015.0604",
      "type": "multimethod field research",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "従業員",
      "sample": "複数研究",
      "method": "役割・資源に対する接近・回避クラフティングを統合",
      "finding": "クラフティングの多様な形と異なる結果を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "観察研究を含む",
        "回避行動の文脈・必要性を確認"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0604",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "lichtenthaler-2019",
      "authors": "Lichtenthaler, P. W., & Fischbach, A.",
      "year": 2019,
      "title": "A Meta-Analysis on Promotion- and Prevention-Focused Job Crafting",
      "journal": "European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 30–50",
      "doi": "10.1080/1359432X.2018.1527767",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "働く人",
      "sample": "ジョブ・クラフティング研究群",
      "method": "促進焦点と予防焦点のクラフティング、態度・健康・業績を統合",
      "finding": "クラフティングの方向により関連する結果が異なる",
      "limitations": [
        "相関研究を多く含む",
        "尺度・定義の異質性"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1527767",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "puranik-2019",
      "authors": "Puranik, H., Koopman, J., & Vough, H. C.",
      "year": 2019,
      "title": "Pardon the Interruption: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda for Research on Work Interruptions",
      "journal": "Journal of Management, 46(6), 806–842",
      "doi": "10.1177/0149206319887428",
      "type": "integrative review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "仕事中の割込み",
      "sample": "実験・フィールド文献",
      "method": "割込みの定義、先行条件、認知・感情・行動結果を統合",
      "finding": "割込みの影響は種類、タイミング、仕事、評価、回復等に依存",
      "limitations": [
        "レビュー",
        "通知オフだけで構造的割込みを解決しない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319887428",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "oprea-2019",
      "authors": "Oprea, B. T., Barzin, L., Vîrgă, D., Iliescu, D., & Rusu, A.",
      "year": 2019,
      "title": "Effectiveness of Job Crafting Interventions: A Meta-Analysis and Utility Analysis",
      "journal": "European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6), 723–741",
      "doi": "10.1080/1359432X.2019.1646728",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "ジョブ・クラフティング介入参加者",
      "sample": "介入研究群",
      "method": "クラフティング行動と仕事・個人結果への介入効果を統合",
      "finding": "一部の近接結果に改善を報告するが効果と研究基盤は限定",
      "limitations": [
        "研究数・標本の制約",
        "追跡期間",
        "個人介入中心"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1646728",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "kellogg-2020",
      "authors": "Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A.",
      "year": 2020,
      "title": "Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control",
      "journal": "Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410",
      "doi": "10.5465/annals.2018.0174",
      "type": "integrative review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "アルゴリズムによる職場統制",
      "sample": "組織・労働研究文献",
      "method": "アルゴリズム統制の仕組みと労働者の対応を統合",
      "finding": "推薦、制限、記録、評価、置換、報酬等を通じた統制と争点を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "統合レビュー",
        "産業・技術の急速な変化",
        "効果量統合ではない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "pega-2021",
      "authors": "Pega, F., Náfrádi, B., Momen, N. C., Ujita, Y., Streicher, K. N., Prüss-Üstün, A. M., et al.",
      "year": 2021,
      "title": "Global, Regional, and National Burdens of Ischemic Heart Disease and Stroke Attributable to Exposure to Long Working Hours for 194 Countries, 2000–2016: A Systematic Analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates",
      "journal": "Environment International, 154, 106595",
      "doi": "10.1016/j.envint.2021.106595",
      "type": "systematic risk assessment",
      "status": "peer-reviewed WHO/ILO joint estimates",
      "population": "194か国の働く人",
      "sample": "世界疾病負担・曝露推計",
      "method": "週55時間以上の長時間労働と虚血性心疾患・脳卒中の負担を推計",
      "finding": "長時間労働に起因する大きな疾病・死亡負担を報告",
      "limitations": [
        "モデル推計",
        "個人の因果診断ではない",
        "労働時間の質・選択等を分離しない"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106595",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "parent-parker-2022",
      "authors": "Parent-Rocheleau, X., & Parker, S. K.",
      "year": 2022,
      "title": "Algorithms as Work Designers: How Algorithmic Management Influences the Design of Jobs",
      "journal": "Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100838",
      "doi": "10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838",
      "type": "integrative conceptual review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "アルゴリズム管理下の仕事",
      "sample": "仕事設計・アルゴリズム管理文献",
      "method": "アルゴリズム管理が仕事特性・仕事の質へ及ぼす経路を統合",
      "finding": "アルゴリズムを仕事配分だけでなく仕事設計主体として捉える枠組みを提示",
      "limitations": [
        "概念・統合研究",
        "急速に変化する技術",
        "長期介入効果は未確立"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "huth-2023",
      "authors": "Huth, K. B. S., & Chung-Yan, G. A.",
      "year": 2023,
      "title": "Quantifying the Evidence for the Absence of the Job Demands and Job Control Interaction on Workers’ Well-Being: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology",
      "doi": "10.1037/apl0001066",
      "type": "Bayesian meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "population": "働く人の要求度・裁量研究",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "要求度と裁量の交互作用について無効果の証拠を定量化",
      "finding": "ウェルビーイングに対する典型的な要求度×裁量交互作用を支持しない証拠を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "主効果や他の条件を否定しない",
        "測定・研究設計の制約"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001066",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "ilo-1997",
      "authors": "International Labour Organization",
      "year": 1997,
      "title": "Protection of Workers’ Personal Data: An ILO Code of Practice",
      "journal": "International Labour Organization",
      "url": "https://www.ilo.org/publications/protection-workers%E2%80%99-personal-data-ilo-code-practice",
      "type": "official code of practice",
      "status": "official guidance",
      "population": "労働者個人データ",
      "sample": "該当なし",
      "method": "収集・利用・保管・アクセス等の原則を提示",
      "finding": "労働者データの目的限定・透明性・権利保護を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "拘束的条約ではない",
        "国内法を別途確認"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "公式指針・制度",
      "source_url": "https://www.ilo.org/publications/protection-workers%E2%80%99-personal-data-ilo-code-practice",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "who-2022",
      "authors": "World Health Organization",
      "year": 2022,
      "title": "WHO Guidelines on Mental Health at Work",
      "journal": "World Health Organization, ISBN 9789240053052",
      "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052",
      "type": "official evidence-based guideline",
      "status": "official guideline",
      "population": "働く人と職場",
      "sample": "組織介入、管理職・労働者研修、個人介入、復職等",
      "method": "ガイドライン開発手続に基づく推奨",
      "finding": "心理社会的リスクへの組織的介入、合理的配慮等を推奨",
      "limitations": [
        "仕事設計専用ではない",
        "国内制度・個別状況を確認"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "公式指針・制度",
      "source_url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "eu-platform-2024",
      "authors": "European Parliament and Council of the European Union",
      "year": 2024,
      "title": "Directive (EU) 2024/2831 on Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work",
      "journal": "Official Journal of the European Union",
      "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/2831/oj/eng",
      "type": "official legal instrument",
      "status": "EU directive",
      "population": "EUのプラットフォーム労働",
      "sample": "該当なし",
      "method": "雇用上の地位、アルゴリズム管理、個人データ、透明性、人の監督等を規定",
      "finding": "アルゴリズム管理に透明性、公平性、人の監督、安全、説明責任を求める",
      "limitations": [
        "EUプラットフォーム労働に関する法令",
        "日本へ直接適用されない",
        "国内実装状況を確認"
      ],
      "evidence_role": "公式指針・制度",
      "source_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/2831/oj/eng",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    }
  ]
}