{
  "name": "チームワーク・協働・対立 研究メタデータ",
  "version": "0.1",
  "notice": "論文本文・尺度項目は含みません。各権利者の条件に従ってください。",
  "studies": [
    {
      "id": "marks-2001",
      "authors": "Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J.",
      "year": 2001,
      "title": "A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes",
      "journal": "Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376",
      "doi": "10.5465/amr.2001.4845785",
      "type": "conceptual taxonomy",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "population": "組織内チーム",
      "sample": "既存のチーム過程研究",
      "method": "移行・行動・対人過程を時間局面で整理",
      "finding": "チーム過程を固定特性でなく反復する局面として整理",
      "limitations": [
        "概念論文",
        "効果量の推定ではない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845785",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "ilgen-2005",
      "authors": "Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D.",
      "year": 2005,
      "title": "Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models",
      "journal": "Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543",
      "doi": "10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250",
      "type": "integrative review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "組織内チーム",
      "sample": "複数領域のチーム研究",
      "method": "入力―媒介―結果―再入力の研究を統合",
      "finding": "チームは循環し発達する動的システムと整理",
      "limitations": [
        "レビュー",
        "チーム種別・時間幅が多様"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "salas-2005",
      "authors": "Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S.",
      "year": 2005,
      "title": "Is There a “Big Five” in Teamwork?",
      "journal": "Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599",
      "doi": "10.1177/1046496405277134",
      "type": "integrative framework",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "population": "仕事チーム",
      "sample": "チームワーク研究",
      "method": "主要行動と調整機構を統合",
      "finding": "チームリーダーシップ、相互監視、バックアップ、適応、チーム志向等を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "統合枠組み",
        "五要素だけで全チームを説明しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405277134",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "kozlowski-2006",
      "authors": "Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R.",
      "year": 2006,
      "title": "Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams",
      "journal": "Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124",
      "doi": "10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x",
      "type": "evidence review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事グループ・チーム",
      "sample": "主要なチーム研究群",
      "method": "構成、形成、リーダーシップ、訓練等を評価",
      "finding": "有効性は構成・過程・学習・組織支援の組合せに依存",
      "limitations": [
        "レビュー時点の文献",
        "単一処方ではない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "mathieu-2008",
      "authors": "Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L.",
      "year": 2008,
      "title": "Team Effectiveness 1997–2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future",
      "journal": "Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476",
      "doi": "10.1177/0149206308316061",
      "type": "decade review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "組織内チーム",
      "sample": "1997–2007年の研究",
      "method": "IMOI枠組みでチーム研究を統合",
      "finding": "構成、媒介状態、過程、成果、文脈を総合",
      "limitations": [
        "レビュー",
        "急速に変わる仮想化等は更新が必要"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "lepine-2008",
      "authors": "LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R.",
      "year": 2008,
      "title": "A Meta-Analysis of Teamwork Processes: Tests of a Multidimensional Model and Relationships With Team Effectiveness Criteria",
      "journal": "Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273–307",
      "doi": "10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事・実験チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "移行・行動・対人過程と有効性の関連を統合",
      "finding": "複数のチームワーク過程が成果と関連",
      "limitations": [
        "相関研究を含む",
        "過程測定の異質性"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "mesmer-2009",
      "authors": "Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A.",
      "year": 2009,
      "title": "Information Sharing and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535–546",
      "doi": "10.1037/a0013773",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "チーム意思決定・遂行",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "情報共有と成果、共有情報・独自情報を統合",
      "finding": "情報共有は成果と関連するが情報の種類と課題条件が重要",
      "limitations": [
        "相関・実験研究混在",
        "共有量と利用の質を区別"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "dechurch-2010",
      "authors": "DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R.",
      "year": 2010,
      "title": "The Cognitive Underpinnings of Effective Teamwork: A Meta-Analysis",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53",
      "doi": "10.1037/a0017328",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事・実験チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "共有認知、チーム過程、成果の関連を統合",
      "finding": "チーム認知は行動過程・成果と関連",
      "limitations": [
        "構成概念と測定の異質性",
        "因果方向に注意"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017328",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "mathieu-2000",
      "authors": "Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A.",
      "year": 2000,
      "title": "The Influence of Shared Mental Models on Team Process and Performance",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273–283",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273",
      "type": "field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "population": "訓練チーム",
      "sample": "特定のチーム標本",
      "method": "課題・チーム共有メンタルモデルと過程・成果を測定",
      "finding": "共有理解の種類が過程・成果へ異なる関係を示した",
      "limitations": [
        "特定文脈",
        "共有＝完全一致ではない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "lewis-2003",
      "authors": "Lewis, K.",
      "year": 2003,
      "title": "Measuring Transactive Memory Systems in the Field: Scale Development and Validation",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587–604",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587",
      "type": "measurement and field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "population": "プロジェクトチーム",
      "sample": "複数標本",
      "method": "専門分化、信頼、調整からなる尺度を開発",
      "finding": "トランザクティブ・メモリーの測定を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "自己報告を含む",
        "尺度利用・翻訳条件を確認"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "moreland-2000",
      "authors": "Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky, L.",
      "year": 2000,
      "title": "Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication?",
      "journal": "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 117–133",
      "doi": "10.1006/obhd.2000.2891",
      "type": "laboratory experiment",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "population": "実験グループ",
      "sample": "実験参加者",
      "method": "共同訓練と情報共有条件を比較",
      "finding": "誰が何を知るかの学習が集団成果に関係",
      "limitations": [
        "実験課題",
        "職場への一般化に注意"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2891",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "marks-2002",
      "authors": "Marks, M. A., Sabella, M. J., Burke, C. S., & Zaccaro, S. J.",
      "year": 2002,
      "title": "The Impact of Cross-Training on Team Effectiveness",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 3–13",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.3",
      "type": "team training experiment",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "population": "チーム課題",
      "sample": "訓練チーム",
      "method": "クロストレーニングの共有知識・調整への影響を評価",
      "finding": "相互の役割理解を通じた調整改善を報告",
      "limitations": [
        "訓練・課題文脈",
        "全員に全技能を求めない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.3",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "gully-2002",
      "authors": "Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M.",
      "year": 2002,
      "title": "A Meta-Analysis of Team-Efficacy, Potency, and Performance: Interdependence and Level of Analysis as Moderators",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事・実験チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "集合的効力感と成果を統合し相互依存等を検討",
      "finding": "集団の遂行可能感と成果の関連は相互依存・分析水準で変化",
      "limitations": [
        "因果方向",
        "過信と区別"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "beal-2003",
      "authors": "Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L.",
      "year": 2003,
      "title": "Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "集団・チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "課題・社会的結束と成果の関係を統合",
      "finding": "結束と成果は関連するが定義と課題条件が重要",
      "limitations": [
        "相関研究",
        "高結束の副作用を直接保証しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "dedreu-2003",
      "authors": "De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R.",
      "year": 2003,
      "title": "Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事・実験チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "タスク対立・関係対立と成果・満足の関連を統合",
      "finding": "両対立は平均として成果・満足と負の関連",
      "limitations": [
        "研究時期・文脈",
        "タスク対立を常に有益と断定しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "simons-2000",
      "authors": "Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S.",
      "year": 2000,
      "title": "Task Conflict and Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams: The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102–111",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102",
      "type": "field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "population": "経営チーム",
      "sample": "特定組織のチーム",
      "method": "信頼がタスク対立と関係対立の結びつきをどう変えるか検討",
      "finding": "低信頼では課題の異論が個人対立として受け取られやすい",
      "limitations": [
        "経営チーム",
        "観察研究"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "dewit-2012",
      "authors": "De Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A.",
      "year": 2012,
      "title": "The Paradox of Intragroup Conflict: A Meta-Analysis",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390",
      "doi": "10.1037/a0024844",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "組織・実験チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "タスク・関係・プロセス対立と近接・遠隔成果を統合",
      "finding": "対立の種類、時期、相関、課題により関係が異なる",
      "limitations": [
        "高い異質性",
        "因果方向",
        "有益条件は限定"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024844",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "behfar-2008",
      "authors": "Behfar, K. J., Peterson, R. S., Mannix, E. A., & Trochim, W. M. K.",
      "year": 2008,
      "title": "The Critical Role of Conflict Resolution in Teams: A Close Look at the Links Between Conflict Type, Conflict Management Strategies, and Team Outcomes",
      "journal": "Organization Science, 19(1), 170–188",
      "doi": "10.1287/orsc.1070.0305",
      "type": "longitudinal field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "population": "プロジェクトチーム",
      "sample": "複数チーム",
      "method": "対立の種類、管理方略、成果を時間的に分析",
      "finding": "問題解決・公平・受容可能な配分等の扱いが成果と関係",
      "limitations": [
        "特定プロジェクト文脈",
        "観察研究"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0305",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "tjosvold-2008",
      "authors": "Tjosvold, D.",
      "year": 2008,
      "title": "The Conflict-Positive Organization: It Depends Upon Us",
      "journal": "Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 19–28",
      "doi": "10.1002/job.473",
      "type": "integrative review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "職場の対立",
      "sample": "協同目標・対立研究",
      "method": "協同的・競争的目標と論争の扱いを統合",
      "finding": "開かれた論争は協同目標と技能に依存すると整理",
      "limitations": [
        "ナラティブ統合",
        "権力差・被害事案へ直結しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/job.473",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "jehn-1999",
      "authors": "Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A.",
      "year": 1999,
      "title": "Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups",
      "journal": "Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763",
      "doi": "10.2307/2667054",
      "type": "field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "population": "仕事グループ",
      "sample": "組織内チーム",
      "method": "多様性、対立、成果の関係を検討",
      "finding": "多様性の種類と対立・課題により結果が異なる",
      "limitations": [
        "観察研究",
        "時代・組織文脈"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "vanknippenberg-2004",
      "authors": "van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C.",
      "year": 2004,
      "title": "Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research Agenda",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008",
      "type": "integrative theory review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "多様な仕事グループ",
      "sample": "多様性研究",
      "method": "情報・意思決定と社会的カテゴリー化を統合",
      "finding": "多様性は情報精緻化と分断の双方を生み得る",
      "limitations": [
        "概念統合",
        "効果量推定ではない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "joshi-2009",
      "authors": "Joshi, A., & Roh, H.",
      "year": 2009,
      "title": "The Role of Context in Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review",
      "journal": "Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599–627",
      "doi": "10.5465/amj.2009.41331491",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "産業・職業・チーム文脈を調整要因として多様性研究を統合",
      "finding": "多様性の関係は文脈と多様性次元に依存",
      "limitations": [
        "観察研究中心",
        "カテゴリの粗さ"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41331491",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "stahl-2010",
      "authors": "Stahl, G. K., Maznevski, M. L., Voigt, A., & Jonsen, K.",
      "year": 2010,
      "title": "Unraveling the Effects of Cultural Diversity in Teams: A Meta-Analysis of Research on Multicultural Work Groups",
      "journal": "Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 690–709",
      "doi": "10.1057/jibs.2009.85",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "多文化チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "文化的多様性の過程・成果を統合",
      "finding": "創造性等の可能性と対立・社会統合上の負担が併存",
      "limitations": [
        "文脈・測定の異質性",
        "国籍を文化そのものとしない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.85",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "bell-2011",
      "authors": "Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L.",
      "year": 2011,
      "title": "Getting Specific About Demographic Diversity Variable and Team Performance Relationships: A Meta-Analysis",
      "journal": "Journal of Management, 37(3), 709–743",
      "doi": "10.1177/0149206310365001",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事・実験チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "人口統計的多様性の各次元と成果を統合",
      "finding": "多様性次元と課題・文脈によって関連が異なる",
      "limitations": [
        "カテゴリ内差を捨象",
        "不平等・差別を直接測らない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365001",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "homan-2007",
      "authors": "Homan, A. C., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W.",
      "year": 2007,
      "title": "Bridging Faultlines by Valuing Diversity: Diversity Beliefs, Information Elaboration, and Performance in Diverse Work Groups",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1189–1199",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1189",
      "type": "laboratory and field studies",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "population": "多様なチーム",
      "sample": "複数研究",
      "method": "多様性信念、情報精緻化、成果を検討",
      "finding": "多様性を価値ある資源とみなす条件が情報利用に関係",
      "limitations": [
        "実験・特定文脈",
        "スローガンだけでは足りない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1189",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "edmondson-1999",
      "authors": "Edmondson, A.",
      "year": 1999,
      "title": "Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams",
      "journal": "Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383",
      "doi": "10.2307/2666999",
      "type": "field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "population": "仕事チーム",
      "sample": "製造業のチーム",
      "method": "心理的安全性、学習行動、成果を分析",
      "finding": "心理的安全性がチーム学習行動に関係",
      "limitations": [
        "観察研究",
        "高基準・説明責任の代替ではない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "frazier-2017",
      "authors": "Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V.",
      "year": 2017,
      "title": "Psychological Safety: A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension",
      "journal": "Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165",
      "doi": "10.1111/peps.12183",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "職場の個人・チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "心理的安全性の先行要因・結果を統合",
      "finding": "心理的安全性は情報共有、学習、成果等と関連",
      "limitations": [
        "相関研究中心",
        "集団水準と個人知覚を区別"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "dedreu-west-2001",
      "authors": "De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A.",
      "year": 2001,
      "title": "Minority Dissent and Team Innovation: The Importance of Participation in Decision Making",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191–1201",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191",
      "type": "field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "population": "仕事チーム",
      "sample": "組織内チーム",
      "method": "少数意見、意思決定参加、革新を検討",
      "finding": "参加条件の下で少数意見が革新に関係",
      "limitations": [
        "観察研究",
        "反対意見を強制しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "nicolaides-2014",
      "authors": "Nicolaides, V. C., LaPort, K. A., Chen, T. R., Tomassetti, A. J., Weis, E. J., Zaccaro, S. J., & Cortina, J. M.",
      "year": 2014,
      "title": "The Shared Leadership of Teams: A Meta-Analysis of Proximal, Distal, and Moderating Relationships",
      "journal": "The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 923–942",
      "doi": "10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.006",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事・実験チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "共有リーダーシップとチーム過程・成果を統合",
      "finding": "共有リーダーシップは平均として有効性と関連",
      "limitations": [
        "相関研究を含む",
        "責任の所在を曖昧にしない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.006",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "wang-2014",
      "authors": "Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z.",
      "year": 2014,
      "title": "A Meta-Analysis of Shared Leadership and Team Effectiveness",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 181–198",
      "doi": "10.1037/a0034531",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "組織・実験チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "共有リーダーシップと有効性、条件を統合",
      "finding": "複雑な仕事等で有効性との関連が強い傾向",
      "limitations": [
        "測定差",
        "公式リーダー不要を意味しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034531",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "gibson-2006",
      "authors": "Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L.",
      "year": 2006,
      "title": "Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation",
      "journal": "Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495",
      "doi": "10.2189/asqu.51.3.451",
      "type": "field study",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "population": "仮想チーム",
      "sample": "多国籍企業のチーム",
      "method": "仮想性の複数次元と革新を分析",
      "finding": "仮想性は一つの有無でなく複数の設計次元",
      "limitations": [
        "観察研究",
        "特定企業・時代の技術"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.3.451",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "gilson-2015",
      "authors": "Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M.",
      "year": 2015,
      "title": "Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities",
      "journal": "Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337",
      "doi": "10.1177/0149206314559946",
      "type": "integrative review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仮想チーム",
      "sample": "10年間の研究",
      "method": "仮想チーム研究の主要テーマを統合",
      "finding": "技術、距離、信頼、リーダーシップ、境界等を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "レビュー",
        "技術更新が速い"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "breuer-2016",
      "authors": "Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G.",
      "year": 2016,
      "title": "Does Trust Matter More in Virtual Teams? A Meta-Analysis of Trust and Team Effectiveness Considering Virtuality and Documentation as Moderators",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1151–1177",
      "doi": "10.1037/apl0000113",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "対面・仮想チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "信頼、有効性、仮想性、文書化を統合",
      "finding": "信頼は有効性と関連し、仮想性・文書化が条件となる",
      "limitations": [
        "相関研究中心",
        "信頼を監視で代替しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000113",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "yang-2022",
      "authors": "Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., et al.",
      "year": 2022,
      "title": "The Effects of Remote Work on Collaboration Among Information Workers",
      "journal": "Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 43–54",
      "doi": "10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4",
      "type": "observational natural experiment",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "介入・実証研究",
      "population": "情報労働者",
      "sample": "大規模企業のデジタル協働データ",
      "method": "在宅勤務移行前後の協働ネットワーク・通信を分析",
      "finding": "全社的遠隔勤務でネットワークの静的化・サイロ化等を報告",
      "limitations": [
        "単一大企業",
        "デジタル痕跡は協働の全体でない",
        "パンデミック移行"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "seeber-2020",
      "authors": "Seeber, I., Bittner, E., Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, T., de Vreede, G.-J., Elkins, A., Maier, R., Merz, A. B., Oeste-Reiß, S., Randrup, N., Schwabe, G., & Söllner, M.",
      "year": 2020,
      "title": "Machines as Teammates: A Research Agenda on AI in Team Collaboration",
      "journal": "Information & Management, 57(2), 103174",
      "doi": "10.1016/j.im.2019.103174",
      "type": "integrative research agenda",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "population": "AIを用いる協働チーム",
      "sample": "人間―AI協働研究",
      "method": "AIを協働主体として扱う研究課題と設計論点を統合",
      "finding": "AIの能力、役割、相互作用、チーム過程に関する研究課題を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "研究アジェンダ中心",
        "介入効果の統合ではない",
        "技術更新が速い"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103174",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "hulsheger-2009",
      "authors": "Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F.",
      "year": 2009,
      "title": "Team-Level Predictors of Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145",
      "doi": "10.1037/a0015978",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "チーム過程・構成・支援と革新を統合",
      "finding": "ビジョン、外部交流、課題志向等と革新の関係を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "相関研究を含む",
        "革新の定義差"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "rico-2008",
      "authors": "Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C.",
      "year": 2008,
      "title": "Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge-Based Approach",
      "journal": "Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 163–184",
      "doi": "10.5465/amr.2008.27751276",
      "type": "conceptual theory review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "population": "仕事チーム",
      "sample": "調整・チーム認知研究",
      "method": "暗黙的調整の条件と過程を整理",
      "finding": "予測、動的調整、共有知識の役割を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "概念論文",
        "明示的調整の不要を意味しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27751276",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "salas-training-2008",
      "authors": "Salas, E., DiazGranados, D., Klein, C., Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Goodwin, G. F., & Halpin, S. M.",
      "year": 2008,
      "title": "Does Team Training Improve Team Performance? A Meta-Analysis",
      "journal": "Human Factors, 50(6), 903–933",
      "doi": "10.1518/001872008X375009",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事・訓練チーム",
      "sample": "チーム訓練研究群",
      "method": "チーム訓練と認知・感情・過程・成果を統合",
      "finding": "チーム訓練は複数成果を改善する平均効果を示す",
      "limitations": [
        "訓練内容・評価時点の異質性",
        "構造問題の代替ではない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X375009",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "tannenbaum-2013",
      "authors": "Tannenbaum, S. I., & Cerasoli, C. P.",
      "year": 2013,
      "title": "Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis",
      "journal": "Human Factors, 55(1), 231–245",
      "doi": "10.1177/0018720812448394",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "チーム・個人",
      "sample": "デブリーフ研究群",
      "method": "構造化された事後検討と成果を統合",
      "finding": "適切なデブリーフは平均として成果改善と関連",
      "limitations": [
        "実施品質・文脈差",
        "正式調査の代替ではない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812448394",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "mcewan-2017",
      "authors": "McEwan, D., Ruissen, G. R., Eys, M. A., Zumbo, B. D., & Beauchamp, M. R.",
      "year": 2017,
      "title": "The Effectiveness of Teamwork Training on Teamwork Behaviors and Team Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Interventions",
      "journal": "PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0169604",
      "doi": "10.1371/journal.pone.0169604",
      "type": "systematic review and meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "組織・スポーツ・教育等のチーム",
      "sample": "統制介入研究群",
      "method": "チームワーク訓練の行動・成果への効果を統合",
      "finding": "統制研究でチームワーク行動・成果の改善を報告",
      "limitations": [
        "領域混在",
        "介入・測定の異質性"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169604",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "burke-2006",
      "authors": "Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D.",
      "year": 2006,
      "title": "Understanding Team Adaptation: A Conceptual Analysis and Model",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189–1207",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189",
      "type": "conceptual model and review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "基礎理論・測定",
      "population": "仕事・高リスクチーム",
      "sample": "チーム適応研究",
      "method": "変化の検知、意味づけ、計画、実行、学習を統合",
      "finding": "チーム適応を認知・行動・状態の循環として整理",
      "limitations": [
        "概念モデル",
        "英雄的即興を推奨しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "stewart-2006",
      "authors": "Stewart, G. L.",
      "year": 2006,
      "title": "A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance",
      "journal": "Journal of Management, 32(1), 29–55",
      "doi": "10.1177/0149206305277792",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "チーム構成・設計特性と成果の関連を統合",
      "finding": "チーム設計の複数特性と成果の関係、課題条件を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "観察研究を含む",
        "平均関連を固定的な最適人数へ直結しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277792",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "bell-2007",
      "authors": "Bell, S. T.",
      "year": 2007,
      "title": "Deep-Level Composition Variables as Predictors of Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis",
      "journal": "Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 595–615",
      "doi": "10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.595",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "仕事・実験チーム",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "能力・性格等のチーム構成と成果の関連を統合",
      "finding": "深層的構成変数の一部と成果の関係が課題条件等で異なる",
      "limitations": [
        "選抜研究中心",
        "個人診断・差別的推定へ使わない",
        "課題・集計方法の異質性"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.595",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "marrone-2010",
      "authors": "Marrone, J. A.",
      "year": 2010,
      "title": "Team Boundary Spanning: A Multilevel Review of Past Research and Proposals for the Future",
      "journal": "Journal of Management, 36(4), 911–940",
      "doi": "10.1177/0149206309353945",
      "type": "multilevel integrative review",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "組織内チームと外部環境",
      "sample": "境界連携研究",
      "method": "代表、情報探索、調整等の境界活動を統合",
      "finding": "チーム外の情報・資源・正統性を得る境界活動を整理",
      "limitations": [
        "統合レビュー",
        "境界担当者の負担・権限を個別評価"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309353945",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "karau-1993",
      "authors": "Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D.",
      "year": 1993,
      "title": "Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration",
      "journal": "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706",
      "doi": "10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681",
      "type": "meta-analysis",
      "status": "peer-reviewed",
      "evidence_role": "統合研究",
      "population": "実験・作業集団",
      "sample": "先行研究群",
      "method": "共同作業時の努力低下と調整要因を統合",
      "finding": "個人努力の識別可能性、課題価値、期待等が社会的手抜きに関係",
      "limitations": [
        "実験研究を多く含む",
        "貢献を監視量だけで判定しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "who-2022",
      "authors": "World Health Organization",
      "year": 2022,
      "title": "WHO Guidelines on Mental Health at Work",
      "journal": "World Health Organization",
      "url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052",
      "type": "official evidence-based guideline",
      "status": "official",
      "evidence_role": "公式指針・制度",
      "population": "働く人と職場",
      "sample": "該当なし",
      "method": "公式文書の原則・要件を整理",
      "finding": "心理社会的リスクへの組織的介入、管理職・労働者支援等を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "チームワーク専用ではない",
        "国内制度・個別状況を確認"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "ilo-c190",
      "authors": "International Labour Organization",
      "year": 2019,
      "title": "Violence and Harassment Convention, 2019 (No. 190)",
      "journal": "International Labour Organization",
      "url": "https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C190",
      "type": "international labour convention",
      "status": "official",
      "evidence_role": "公式指針・制度",
      "population": "働く人と職場",
      "sample": "該当なし",
      "method": "公式文書の原則・要件を整理",
      "finding": "暴力・ハラスメントのない仕事の世界に関する権利と包括的予防を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "批准・国内法を確認",
        "通常の意見対立と被害行為を同一視しない"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C190",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    },
    {
      "id": "ilo-data",
      "authors": "International Labour Organization",
      "year": 1997,
      "title": "Protection of Workers’ Personal Data: An ILO Code of Practice",
      "journal": "International Labour Organization",
      "url": "https://www.ilo.org/publications/protection-workers%E2%80%99-personal-data-ilo-code-practice",
      "type": "official code of practice",
      "status": "official",
      "evidence_role": "公式指針・制度",
      "population": "働く人と職場",
      "sample": "該当なし",
      "method": "公式文書の原則・要件を整理",
      "finding": "労働者個人データの目的限定、透明性、アクセス等の原則を提示",
      "limitations": [
        "拘束的条約ではない",
        "国内法を別途確認"
      ],
      "source_url": "https://www.ilo.org/publications/protection-workers%E2%80%99-personal-data-ilo-code-practice",
      "last_human_verified": "2026-07-12"
    }
  ]
}