{
  "name": "心理的安全性 研究の質と限界",
  "version": "0.4",
  "notice": "簡易評価であり、正式なRoB 2・ROBINS-I・AMSTAR 2評価ではない。",
  "assessments": [
    {
      "id": "frazier-2017",
      "design": "meta-analysis",
      "confidence_for_association": "moderate",
      "confidence_for_causality": "low",
      "strengths": [
        "136独立サンプル",
        "個人・グループを分離",
        "モデレーターと出版バイアスを検討"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "横断研究が多い",
        "自己報告・共通方法バイアス",
        "一部で出版バイアス",
        "異質性が高い項目"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "newman-2017",
      "design": "systematic review",
      "confidence_for_synthesis": "moderate",
      "strengths": [
        "83研究を整理",
        "測定課題を明示"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "検索時点が古い",
        "研究デザインの弱さを引き継ぐ",
        "介入根拠が少ない"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "odonovan-interventions-2020",
      "design": "systematic review of interventions",
      "confidence_for_intervention": "low-to-moderate",
      "strengths": [
        "PRISMA準拠",
        "プロトコル登録",
        "教育・非教育介入を整理"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "14介入",
        "医療領域中心",
        "結果が混在",
        "客観的指標不足"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "capezio-2023",
      "design": "rapid evidence assessment",
      "confidence_for_synthesis": "moderate",
      "strengths": [
        "二者評価",
        "明示的な質評価",
        "検索式・除外・研究表を公開"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "多くの研究が低品質",
        "因果確認不可",
        "非西洋・仮想チーム等を除外",
        "迅速レビューとして検索範囲を制限"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "gonzalez-2026",
      "design": "umbrella review",
      "confidence_for_relational_enablers": "moderate",
      "strengths": [
        "5データベースとGoogle Scholar",
        "11レビューを統合",
        "批判的吟味",
        "文化・人種・民族の欠落を検討"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "レビュー間で透明性に差",
        "医療領域の比重",
        "一次研究の弱さを引き継ぐ",
        "アイデンティティ研究が少ない"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "kobayashi-2025",
      "design": "cluster randomized controlled trial",
      "confidence_for_intervention": "moderate-low",
      "strengths": [
        "部署単位の無作為割付",
        "3時点",
        "クラスター効果を調整",
        "日本の実組織"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "単一企業・単一拠点",
        "自己報告",
        "短期追跡",
        "盲検化困難",
        "クラスター内相関と群間不均衡",
        "データ非公開"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "castro-2025",
      "design": "randomized field experiment discussion paper",
      "confidence_for_intervention": "low-until-peer-review",
      "strengths": [
        "大規模な実組織フィールド実験"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "査読前",
        "版により報告サンプルの表現が異なる",
        "再現と外部評価が必要"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "ochiai-otsuka-2022",
      "design": "Japanese scale validation",
      "confidence_for_measurement": "moderate",
      "strengths": [
        "翻訳手順",
        "再検査信頼性",
        "複数関連概念との妥当性検討"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "確認的因子分析は周辺的に許容",
        "オンライン標本",
        "基準値を提供する研究ではない"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "matsuo-2024",
      "design": "Japanese scale validation",
      "confidence_for_measurement": "moderate",
      "strengths": [
        "構造・内的一貫性・収束妥当性を検討"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "尺度間相関中心",
        "業界横断の一般化に限界"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sasaki-2022",
      "design": "Japanese scale validation and cross-sectional analysis",
      "confidence_for_measurement": "moderate",
      "confidence_for_outcome_causality": "low",
      "strengths": [
        "日本の労働者",
        "尺度検証と関連指標を報告"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "横断研究",
        "自己報告",
        "因果関係は判断できない"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "eldor-2023",
      "design": "five-study boundary-condition test",
      "confidence_for_boundary_condition": "moderate",
      "strengths": [
        "複数レベル・複数組織",
        "実業績を含む",
        "説明責任という緩衝要因を検討"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "特定の定型業務仮説",
        "他研究による追試が必要",
        "全成果へ一般化できない"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "liu-measures-2024",
      "design": "measurement meta-analysis preprint",
      "confidence_for_measurement": "low-until-peer-review",
      "strengths": [
        "217研究",
        "尺度横断の信頼性を整理"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "査読前",
        "異質性が極めて高い",
        "構成概念妥当性の課題が残る"
      ]
    }
  ]
}