{
  "name": "1on1・上司部下面談 研究の質と限界",
  "version": "0.1",
  "notice": "簡易評価であり正式なRoB評価ではない。",
  "assessments": [
    {
      "study_id": "flinchum-2022",
      "design": "direct 1:1 conceptual review",
      "strength": "1on1直接だが概念研究",
      "directness": "1on1直接・概念",
      "key_limits": [
        "直接効果の実証研究ではない",
        "命題と実務示唆を効果証明として扱わない"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "kluger-denisi-1996",
      "design": "meta-analysis",
      "strength": "統合研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "1on1固有ではない",
        "課題・研究設定が異質",
        "平均効果を個別面談へ直結しない"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "gerstner-day-1997",
      "design": "meta-analysis",
      "strength": "統合研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "1on1の効果ではない",
        "関係の質と面談頻度を区別",
        "自己報告の共通方法"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "cawley-1998",
      "design": "meta-analysis",
      "strength": "統合研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "評価面談であり育成1on1ではない",
        "反応と業績効果を区別"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "edmondson-1999",
      "design": "team field study",
      "strength": "隣接領域の概念・観察研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "チームレベル",
        "1on1固有ではない",
        "単独で因果確定しない"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "keeping-levy-2000",
      "design": "measurement and field study",
      "strength": "隣接領域の概念・観察研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "人事評価文脈",
        "1on1固有ではない",
        "自己報告"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "locke-latham-2002",
      "design": "integrative theory review",
      "strength": "隣接領域の概念・観察研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "1on1固有ではない",
        "学習目標・複雑課題・倫理・目標葛藤に注意"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "smither-2005",
      "design": "meta-analysis and review",
      "strength": "統合研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "1on1固有ではない",
        "多面評価",
        "平均効果と個人差"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "detert-burris-2007",
      "design": "multisource field study",
      "strength": "隣接領域の概念・観察研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "観察研究",
        "発言機会と実際に聞かれることを区別",
        "1on1固有ではない"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "pulakos-2011",
      "design": "evidence-informed conceptual review",
      "strength": "隣接領域の概念・観察研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "1on1頻度の実験ではない",
        "概念・実務レビュー"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "pichler-2012",
      "design": "meta-analysis",
      "strength": "統合研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "評価反応が中心",
        "1on1固有ではない",
        "因果方向"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "anseel-2015",
      "design": "meta-analysis",
      "strength": "統合研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "フィードバックを求める行動であり1on1効果ではない",
        "観察研究中心"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "theeboom-2014",
      "design": "meta-analysis",
      "strength": "統合研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "外部・専門コーチを含む",
        "管理職1on1と同義でない",
        "研究数・質の制約"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "morrison-2014",
      "design": "integrative review",
      "strength": "隣接領域の概念・観察研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "1on1固有ではない",
        "voiceを引き出すことと応答することを区別"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "jones-2016",
      "design": "meta-analysis",
      "strength": "統合研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "管理職—部下コーチングを明示的に除外",
        "研究数17",
        "1on1へ直接外挿できない"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "martin-2016",
      "design": "meta-analysis",
      "strength": "統合研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "1on1の頻度・構造の効果ではない",
        "因果方向",
        "関係格差の倫理"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "frazier-2017",
      "design": "meta-analysis",
      "strength": "統合研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "主にチーム研究",
        "1on1固有ではない",
        "因果確定ではない"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "kluger-itzchakov-2022",
      "design": "integrative review",
      "strength": "隣接領域の概念・観察研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "1on1固有ではない",
        "傾聴の測定・文脈が異質",
        "聞くことと同意を区別"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "cannon-bowers-2023",
      "design": "meta-analysis",
      "strength": "統合研究",
      "directness": "隣接研究",
      "key_limits": [
        "介入・コーチの異質性",
        "管理職1on1固有でない",
        "出版バイアス・研究品質"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "ilo-1997",
      "design": "official code of practice",
      "strength": "公式指針",
      "directness": "公式指針・ガバナンス",
      "key_limits": [
        "拘束的条約ではない",
        "国内法を別途確認",
        "1997年文書"
      ]
    },
    {
      "study_id": "who-2022",
      "design": "official evidence-based guideline",
      "strength": "公式指針",
      "directness": "公式指針・ガバナンス",
      "key_limits": [
        "1on1専用ではない",
        "管理職面談を治療の代替にしない"
      ]
    }
  ]
}